101年第2學期-4981 非政府組織與地方政府專題 課程資訊

課程分享

選課分析

本課程名額為 12人,已有4人選讀,尚餘名額8人。

評分方式

評分項目 配分比例 說明
課程參與 10
心得報告 20
課堂報告 30
期末報告 40

授課教師

陳秋政

教育目標

地方政府不僅是民主實踐的前線與競技場,同時也是地方公共服務的物流中心、暢貨中心,更是各類政策的神經中樞。為什麼這樣形容呢?因為引導”群眾”追求民主本質始終是地方民主的核心價值,但過程中,利害關係人總是各顯神通而令人冷汗直流。所幸,各類利害關係人所組成的組織或團體之中,不以私益為目的之組織,在質與量方面與日俱增,同時也廣泛地參與地方公共服務,擔任表達民意、建立社群、維護價值、政策倡議的功能。因此,面對地方政府如何落實其公共職能之研究議題,實應瞭解非政府組織與地方政府之互動關係與實務案例。

課程資訊

參考書目

Adorno, Theodor (1964) Opinion research and publicness. In Jostein Gripsrud et al. (eds., 2011), The public sphere (V. 1~V. 4) (p. 193-197). Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE.
Bozeman, Barry (1987) Why All Organizations are Public: A Multi-Dimensional View of Publicness. All Organizations are Public (pp. 83-106). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bozeman, Barry (2008) The “publicness” puzzle revisited: An integrative approach to managing publicness. Presented in the Conference of Minnowbrook Ⅲ.
Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M. (2002) Government–Nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22: 19-30.
Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M. and Derick W. Brinkerhoff (2002) Government–Nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: Evolution, themes and new directions. Public Administration and Development, 22: 3-18.
Cohen, Joshua (1989) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Jostein Gripsrud et al. (eds., 2011), The public sphere (V. 1~V. 4) (p. 31-49). Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE.
Dudley, Larkin (2008) Need for balance? Publicness in the inherently governmental dialogue. Presented in the Conference of Minnowbrook Ⅲ.
Fearon, James (1998) Deliberation as discussion. In Jostein Gripsrud et al. (eds., 2011), The public sphere (V. 1~V. 4) (p. 261-280). Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE.
Feiock, Richard and Hee Soun Jang (2009) Nonprofits as local government service contractors. Public Administration Review, July/August: 668-680.
Habermas, Jürgen (1962) Institutions of the public sphere. In Jostein Gripsrud et al. (eds., 2011), The public sphere (V. 1~V. 4) (p. 31-43). Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE.
Habermas, Jürgen (1992) Civil society, public opinion, and communicative power. In Jostein Gripsrud et al. (eds., 2011), The public sphere (V. 1~V. 4) (p. 52-74). Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE.
Habermas, Jürgen (1992) Further reflections on the public sphere. In Jostein Gripsrud et al. (eds., 2011), The public sphere (V. 1~V. 4) (p. 275-292). Los Angele