102年第1學期-5225 意向與解釋 課程資訊
評分方式
評分項目 | 配分比例 | 說明 |
---|---|---|
平時成績 | 30 | |
期末報告 | 70 |
選課分析
本課程名額為 6人,已有6 人選讀,尚餘名額0人。
登入後可進行最愛課程追蹤 [按此登入]。
授課教師
史偉民教育目標
引導學生了解有關解釋理論的意向論及其爭議
課程資訊
基本資料
選修課,學分數:3-0
上課時間:四/2,3,4
修課班級:哲學碩博1,2
修課年級:年級以上
選課備註:西哲
教師與教學助理
授課教師:史偉民
大班TA或教學助理:尚無資料
Office Hour週二第五、六節;H412
授課大綱
授課大綱:開啟授課大綱(授課計畫表)
(開在新視窗)
參考書目
1. Carroll, N. (2000). Interpretation and Intention: The Debate between Hypothetical and Actual Intentionalism. Metaphilosophy, 31, 1/2: 75-95.
2. Child, W. (2006). Interpreting people and interpreting texts. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 14, 3: 423-441.
3. Dickie, G./ Wilson, W. K. (1995). The Intentional Fallacy: Defending Beardsley. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 53, 3: 233-250.
4. Hirsch, E. D. (1992). In Defense of the Author. In G. Iseminger (ed.), Intention and Interpretation (Philadelphia: Temple University Press): 11-23.
5. Levinson, J. (1992). Intention and Interpretation: A Last Look. In G. Iseminger (ed.), Intention and Interpretation (Philadelphia: Temple University Press): 221-256.
6. Shusterman, R. (1992). Interpretation, Intention, and Truth. In G. Iseminger (ed.), Intention and Interpretation (Philadelphia: Temple University Press): 65-75.
7. Tolhurst, W. E. (1979). On What a Text is and How it Means. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 19: 3-14.
8. Wimsatt Jr., W. K./ Beardsley, M. (1954). The Intentional Fallacy. In: W. K. Wimsatt, Jr. (ed.), The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press (3-18).
開課紀錄
您可查詢過去本課程開課紀錄。 意向與解釋歷史開課紀錄查詢