104年第1學期-5224 康德結果論 課程資訊

評分方式

評分項目	配分比例	說明
出席	20
課堂口頭報告	30
期末報告	50

教育目標

康德的倫理學向來被視為義務論的典範，然而有部份學者卻主張他的倫理學其實是一種結果論。本課程的目的在於檢視結果論的解讀（包括Herman，Wood，Guyer與Cummiskey等人的詮釋），以及堅持義務論的解釋。

基本資料

選修課，學分數：3-0
上課時間：二/2,3,4
修課班級：哲學碩博1,2
修課年級：年級以上
選課備註：西哲

參考書目

1. Cummiskey, D. (1990). Kantian Consequentialism. Ethics, 100, 3: 586-615
2. Guyer, P. (2000). Kants Morality of Law and Morality of Freedom. In P. Guyer, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (129-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Hare, R. M. (1997). Could Kant Have been A Utilitarian? In R. M. Hare, Sorting out Ethics (147-66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Herman, B. (1993). Leaving Deontology Behind. In B. Herman, The Practice of Moral Judgment (208-40). Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University Press.
5. Johnson, R. N. (2006). Value and Autonomy in Kantian Ethics. Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 2 (133-48).
6. Mill, J. S. (1998). General Remarks. In J. S. Mill, Utilitarianism (49-53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Reath, A. (1994). Legislating the Moral Law. Nous 28, 4: 435-64.
8. Schneewind, J. B. (1996). Kant and Stoic Ethics. In S. Engstrom/ J. Whiting (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty (285-301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Wood, A. W. (1999). The Formula of Humanity as End in Itself. In A. W. Wood, Kants Ethical Thought (111-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.