104年第1學期-6642 民主治理與行政改革專題 課程資訊

評分方式

評分項目	配分比例	說明
主題分享	40	簡報內容、台風、解說表現等；使用PPT簡報列入加分
期末報告大綱簡報	20	含PPT簡報內容、設計、台風、解說表現及書面資料
期末報告	30	期末書面報告
課程參與	10	含上課討論、出席演講、班級服務等

教育目標

使學習者能掌握民主治理與行政改革的背景、概念與發展，有助於觀念啟發與實務之運用。

課程概述

本課程分為兩大部份：治理行政改革。在治理部分我們將介公民參與、網絡治理、跨域治理等課題；在行政改革部分，我們將探討組織再造、民營化、績效管理與預算改革等重要議題，期使研習者能掌握「治理」與「改革」之間的動態連結。

基本資料

選修課，學分數：2-0
上課時間：二/10,11
修課班級：公共專班1,2
修課年級：年級以上
選課備註：三組選修

參考書目

1. Blackstock, K. L.(2009).Between a rock and a hard place: Incompatible objectives at the heart of river. Water Science & Technology, 59(3): 425-432.
2. Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, & M. M. Stone (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (1): 44-55.
3. Colvin, J. et al. (2008). Building capacity for co-operative governance as a basis for integrated water resource managing in the Inkomati and Mvoti catchments, South Africa. Water SA, 34(6): 681-689.
4. Domenico, MariaLaura Di, et al. (2009). The Dialectic of Social Exchange: Theorizing Corporate Social Enterprise Collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(8): 887–907.
5. Ghose, Rina (2005). The Complexities of Citizen Participation through Collaborative Governance. Space and Polity, 9(1): 61-75.
6. Heikkila, Tanya and Andrea K. Gerlak (2005). The Formation of Large-scale Collaborative Resource Management Institutions: Clarifying the Roles of Stakeholders, Science, and Institutions. The Policy Studies Journal, 33(4): 583-612.
7. Heyns, P. S. vH. (2007).Governance of a shared and contested resource: A case study of the Okavango River Basin. Water Policy, 9(2): 149-167.
8. Ho, Peter (2006). Trajectories for Greening in China: Theory and Practice. Development and Change, 37(1): 3-28.
9. Holmes, Sara & Lance Moir (2007). Developing a conceptual framework to identify corporate innovations through engagement with non-profit stakeholders. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 7 (4): 414-422.
10. Kidd, S. & D. Shaw (2007). Integrated water resource management and institutional integration: Realising the potential of spatial planning in England. The Geographical Journal, 173(4): 312-329.
11. Lee, Tai Sik (2004). Buried treasure. Civil Engineering, 33-41.
12. Makipaa, Marko (2009). Inter-organizational information systems in cooperative inter-organizational relationships: Study of the factors influencing to success. IFIP (Interna