105年第1學期-6642 民主治理與行政改革專題 課程資訊
評分方式
評分項目 | 配分比例 | 說明 |
---|
選課分析
本課程名額為 10人,已有2 人選讀,尚餘名額8人。
登入後可進行最愛課程追蹤 [按此登入]。
授課教師
李允傑教育目標
使學習者能掌握民主治理與行政改革的背景、概念與發展,有助於觀念啟發與實務之運用。
課程概述
本課程分為兩大部份:治理行政改革。在治理部分我們將介公民參與、網絡治理、跨域治理等課題;在行政改革部分,我們將探討組織再造、民營化、績效管理與預算改革等重要議題,期使研習者能掌握「治理」與「改革」之間的動態連結。
課程資訊
基本資料
選修課,學分數:2-0
上課時間:二/10,11
修課班級:公共專班1
修課年級:年級以上
選課備註:三組選修
教師與教學助理
授課教師:李允傑
大班TA或教學助理:尚無資料
Office Hour請先預約。
授課大綱
授課大綱:開啟授課大綱(授課計畫表)
(開在新視窗)
參考書目
1. Blackstock, K. L.(2009).Between a rock and a hard place: Incompatible objectives at the heart of river. Water Science & Technology, 59(3): 425-432.
2. Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, & M. M. Stone (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (1): 44-55.
3. Colvin, J. et al. (2008). Building capacity for co-operative governance as a basis for integrated water resource managing in the Inkomati and Mvoti catchments, South Africa. Water SA, 34(6): 681-689.
4. Domenico, MariaLaura Di, et al. (2009). The Dialectic of Social Exchange: Theorizing Corporate Social Enterprise Collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(8): 887–907.
5. Ghose, Rina (2005). The Complexities of Citizen Participation through Collaborative Governance. Space and Polity, 9(1): 61-75.
6. Heikkila, Tanya and Andrea K. Gerlak (2005). The Formation of Large-scale Collaborative Resource Management Institutions: Clarifying the Roles of Stakeholders, Science, and Institutions. The Policy Studies Journal, 33(4): 583-612.
7. Heyns, P. S. vH. (2007).Governance of a shared and contested resource: A case study of the Okavango River Basin. Water Policy, 9(2): 149-167.
8. Ho, Peter (2006). Trajectories for Greening in China: Theory and Practice. Development and Change, 37(1): 3-28.
9. Holmes, Sara & Lance Moir (2007). Developing a conceptual framework to identify corporate innovations through engagement with non-profit stakeholders. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 7 (4): 414-422.
10. Kidd, S. & D. Shaw (2007). Integrated water resource management and institutional integration: Realising the potential of spatial planning in England. The Geographical Journal, 173(4): 312-329.
11. Lee, Tai Sik (2004). Buried treasure. Civil Engineering, 33-41.
12. Makipaa, Marko (2009). Inter-organizational information systems in cooperative inter-organizational relationships: Study of the factors influencing to success. IFIP (Interna
開課紀錄
您可查詢過去本課程開課紀錄。 民主治理與行政改革專題歷史開課紀錄查詢