在傳統社會科學的理性主義偏見下，「靈異」常被簡化為迷信或病理現象。本課程之教學策略旨在介入此一邊緣場域，將靈異議題轉化為嚴謹的社會學研究對象。我們不探討現象本身的形上真偽，而是檢視其作為一種文化敘事與社會現實的交織過程。對於社會學系學生而言，這不僅是學術領域的拓張，更是對當代社會中「不可見性」與「邊緣主體」的一種深度辨識。透過對超自然者（神聖者或靈異者）存在預設進行暫時封存（方法學不可知論），研究者得以達成與傳統神學前提的徹底獨立，轉而專注於描述意識中呈現的現象流動，引導學生探索靈異經驗和靈異敘事的社會學意涵。

del Pilar Blanco, M. and Peeren, E. (Eds.). (2013). The spectralities reader: Ghosts and haunting in contemporary cultural theory. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Driscoll, C. M., & Miller, M. R. (2020). Method as Identity: Manufacturing Distance in the Academic Study of Religion. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Dziuban, Z. (Ed.). (2019). The» Spectral Turn «: Jewish Ghosts in the Polish Post-Holocaust Imaginaire (Vol. 6). transcript Verlag.

Goldstein, D., Grider, S., & Thomas, J. B. (2007). Haunting experiences: Ghosts in contemporary folklore. University Press of Colorado.

Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. U of Minnesota Press.

Ironside, R. and Wooffitt, R. (2022). Making sense of the paranormal: The interactional construction of unexplained experiences. Springer Nature.

Ironside, R., & Wooitt, R. (2022). Making sense of the paranormal: The interactional construction of unexplained experiences. Springer Nature.

Peeren, E. (2014). The spectral metaphor: Living ghosts and the agency of invisibility. Springer.
Twiss, S. B., & Conser, W. H. (Eds.). (1992). Experience of the Sacred: Readings in the Phenomenology of Religion. UPNE.